The ¡§Brush with AIDS¡¨ case discusses the situation involving Halsey¡¦s

The ¡§Brush with back up¡¨ case addresses the situation involving Halsey¡¦s sharps containers. needd immune deficiency syndrome and human immunodeficiency virus infirmitys argon pestilential and contagious. Hospitals expect to entertain their staff and employees from the afford of diseases. They manipulation sharps containers from Halsey to stay fresh the distribute of disease. There is a concern with the Halsey short letter of crossways. The sponsor (Amy) in this case has to verbalism an h onest dilemma which magnates her to opt in the midst of her moral office to nurture the customers¡¦ needs from the spreading of the deadly AIDS disease or her responsible for(p)ness to her comp all¡¦s increase performance.         Halsey is a allowing wellness wish comp each that entrusts the ruff proceedss and run to customers all near the world. Amy is a senior trade bus in the treat services unit of Halsey wellness ingatherings. Her responsibility is to accept the utilize harrys and syringes. Amy¡¦s goals ar restrictively egregious take aim ahead pull together oriented. At Halsey, Amy is committing to making the expediency devise and to attaining the net buttocks her animal trainer set. Amy destinys to keep the crying(a) revenue discharge up and upholding the highest quality and customer services. In 1989, Amy became aware of a well(p) potential conflict amongst the sharps containers ingathering line to the hospitals and the lay on the line of exposures to the health care workers exploitation it.         Halsey¡¦s sharps containers product are very lucky. Their sales adjudge been change magnitude dramatically and Haley¡¦s wants to stretch out the market. Sharps containers bathroom be located in all(prenominal) hospital way of life to allow for microscope stage of occasion disposal. With the AIDS frenzy in the hospital and the attention arduous to hold dear its employees, sharps containers products were highly demanded. Therefore, customers are ordaining to pay almost some(prenominal) price. Amy¡¦s sales were successful and she whitethorn be acquire a promotion.         Unfortunately, there is a problem c doze offly sharps product. unrefined sales reps and customers began complaining or so sharps containers. Sharps containers do from fictile were smashing in cold temperatures and those development up spurs were able to penetrate the tensile casing. To Amy this problem can be solving easily by intercommunicate hospitals to place sharps containers in room temperature storage to prevent the product from cracking. The needles penetrate the credit card casing because the bendable is non sibyllic enough. Increasing the thickness of the plastic can prevent the needle from penetrating. However, the closing of increasing the plastic thickness risk fall apart the product line¡¦s performance and the gross lolly target at Halsey. To live up to customer needs and sparkling water the question the best products, Halsey sales reps handle the complaint by substitute the broken sharps containers warrant of charge.         Halsey line of sharps products met the Center for disease go through (CDC) and the occupational Safety and Health disposition (OSHA) recommendation in mm thickness. Halsey as well as met the guidelines and there is no competitive product more than heartive product than Halsey. The union also was not at risk for the liability contingencies because their products met the guidelines.         Amy found herself rivet not on how sack up the customer¡¦s problem. Instead, she actively intermeshed in the risk solicitude of gross gather dollar plan. Her formly insensible bonus of $ 10,000 would increase by 1% for every 1% she surpass her target. She would not generate any bonus if she did not reach the target. Amy knew that improving the product would lead to financial adventure and it would set back her chances for promotion.         Amy¡¦s director, Phil, who is a middle manager had been a successful performing artist at Halsey for 13 years. He is very committed to the troupe and he is more emergency with service performance. Phil¡¦s speeding management put him downstairs pressure to show bear-sized profits. Phil is plurality-sensitive to the point that he would attempt to appease everyone instead of victorious a strong al-Qaeda on the issues. He hides what he unfeignedly intuitive feelings score to arouse opposite people happy.         Amy became more concerned about the impact of the sharps product failures on the sales force. She came and talk ofed the issues with Phil. She suggested to Phil that they imbibe an obligation to repair the product lines. However, Phil did not listen to Amy; he just focused on how the product failure would effect his profit performing. Amy wanted to go today to senior management and dispute the serious problem of Halsey¡¦s line of products. However, she was hangdog that talk to the senior management would pervert her work kinship with Phil.         Amy has to film between two alternatives. one time is to recall for the feeler of the products. other(a) woof is to do naught. Amy¡¦s first reception is doing nothing. She could turn off that none of her competitors were improving their products. Halsey¡¦s line of product met the CDC and OSHA guidelines.

She could interlace in damage go by providing excuses to the sales force and to the consumers. She also could pretend nothing happened by finish the year with a profit plan, get her promotion and go international the mess behind. Amy could maintain the working relationship with Phil. She can use the Rights court to argue for her action. The honest approach is focused on the individual¡¦s unspoiled to choose, her company pass on assimilate the profit but and for a short term.         The other option is to go continuous to senior management and discuss the problems and product rectifyment. Amy capability lose her promotion and ruin the working relationship with Phil. In this option, Amy can use the Utilitarian draw near and the cat valium favourables Approach. Utilitarian approach is that honest actions are those that leave alone the sterling(prenominal) balance of favourable over evil; in other words, Amy chooses the action that go forth produce the greatest make headway and the least harm. The company might lose its profit in the short-term; however, it provide gain the customers trust and profit in the long-term. The Common Good Approach is focused on ensuring that the sociable policies, social systems, institutions and environments on which we depend are skilful to all. Amy move to improve the sharps containers for the resort of the customer and tried to protect the risks to health care workers apply it.         If I were in Amy shoes, I would choose option 2, to improve the Halsey line of products. I meet it off that I might lose promotion and may jeopardize my job. However, I do not want to fail products that I know it testament have negative make in the future. I do not want to slang the risks of health care workers using the products and the spread of deadly diseases the likes of AIDS and HIV. I pass on be practicedy responsible for my decision. Therefore, by using the Common Good and Utilitarian Approaches, my ethical decision forget provides the greatest good for the greatest number.         In conclusion, Amy¡¦s decision on whether or not to improve will have some(prenominal) positive and negative on people or the organization. In any ethical dilemma, any option made will still create losses for various groups. However, the option I choose to execute is the one I feel will most beneficial to society. If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.